Drug Testing
Lindsay Lohan Leaves Rehab!
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Addiction, Drug Rehabilitation, Drug Testing on August 26th, 2010
Lindsay Lohan has been released from rehab, according to a post on the Los Angeles Times. The actress was originally ordered to spend ninety days in rehab, but has been released from the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center after staying for only 22 days. Prior to her stay in rehab, Lohan served 13 days out of a ninety-day jail sentence.
Ms. Lohan’s release from rehab, however, is accompanied by conditions released by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox. Fox ordered that Lindsay undergo intensive outpatient therapy for the next three months, which will include regular counseling and the need to stay in Los Angeles County. She will also be under supervised probation during this time.
The actress will have to comply with the following conditions: that she remain in Los Angeles Country for the duration of the supervised probation, that she undergo random drug testing twice a week, that she undergo psychotherapy four times a week and meet with counselors five times a week. Should Lindsay fail or miss a drug test, it will mean jail time for 30 days.
Lindsay’s lawyer Shawn Chapman Holley shared the following update with reporters after the hearing on Wednesday, where Judge Fox clarified the terms of the actress’ probation: “She has changed… She’s healthy, she’s clear-headed, she’s positive.”
Holley said further that her client’s early release was based on the fact that doctors concluded that there was no further need for Lindsay to stay in the facility: “They started their own fresh evaluation, put her through their own testing and recognized that there was no need for her to be there any longer.”
What People Do to Beat Drug Tests
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Testing on August 24th, 2010
A follow-up article on The Wall Street Journal talked about, among other things, what the Wall Streeters may have done to beat drug tests. In a previous post, we featured the findings of drug-testing firm Sterling Infosystems Inc., which revealed that cocaine use in Wall Street has gone down.
Deal Journal talked to Sterling’s director of occupational health services, John Mallios. Among the things that Mallios discussed was how people tried to beat drug tests. Making these tactics known ought to make drug-testing companies, employers and other such stakeholders be more careful about conducting drug tests, ensuring that these things do not happen.
One option taken by some people who are asked to undergo urine drug testing is diluting their sample. Dilution reduces the concentration of drugs or drug metabolites in the sample, through the addition of fluid. In order to prevent this from happening, drug-testing facilities ask people to collect specimen in a room that does not have a sink, or where the toilet water is tinted.
Others choose to substitute their urine with another person’s urine, or with a synthetic sample. Some drug testing facilities frisk those who are testing to make sure that they are not carrying anything with them into the collection area. At any rate, apparently there are those who succeed in placing another person’s sample in their collection cup, or use such things as liquid or powdered synthetic urine.
Cocaine Use in Wall Street Going Down
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Addiction, Drug Testing on August 22nd, 2010
A post on The Wall Street Journal shared that cocaine use among investment professionals at Wall Street has gone down, although they seem to have replaced coke with marijuana and pills.
This does not mean, however, that Wall Street is a drug-infested profession; for the most part, according to the feature, Wall Street is relatively clean, with only 2 percent of the industry failing drug tests annually, according to drug-testing firm Sterling Infosystems Inc.
Adam Zoia, CEO of executive recruiting firm Glocap Search LLC, shared: “I think the incidence of hard drug use is lower today than it was 10 or 15 years ago… “The banks, in particular, are pretty persnickity on background checks.”
The thing, however, is that drug testing is usually only done among new employees, and random drug testing is rarely done on existing employees; this was revealed by someone described as “a spokesman for a bulge-bracket bank” who requested for anonymity.
That being said, psychologists and counselors say that drug abuse among existing Wall Street employees is not slowing down; if anything, it seems to be peaking, due in part to the credit crisis. Clinical Director William Heran shared that the 24-bed luxury rehab facility Seabrook House in Pennsylvania has catered to quite a number of patients who worked on Wall Street. Seabrook charges $24,000 for a three-month program.
Robert Curry, founder of Turning Point for Leaders, an intervention and rehab company based in Connecticut, shared: “Investment bankers — gunslingers, as we call them — are highly prone to addiction, and there’s a lot of denial among employers. The attitude is: ‘If they can’t fix themselves, then they’re going to have to live with it. We’re not going to put any time and effort into it.”
Erik Morales Comments on Manny Pacquiao and Drug Testing
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Testing, Steroid Abuse on August 19th, 2010
Another boxing star is joining the ranks of Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Paulie Malignaggi in questioning Filipino boxer Manny Pacquiao’s abilities, according to a feature on BoxingScene.com. Erik Morales has the distinction of being the last boxer to defeat Pacquiao in the ring (March 19, 2005, MGM Grand Las Vegas) – although Pacquiao is also responsible for Morales’ first knockout in his boxing career, during a re-match between the two boxers held on January 21, 2006, at the Thomas and Mack Center in Las Vegas.
At any rate, Examiner.com’s Michael Marley shared a conversation with “El Terrible,” who expressed that he could not understand why Pacquiao would not agree to random drug testing. Marley quoted Morales, who said: “I don’t know, I am not familiar with drugs… But I must then ask why he would object to random testing if he has nothing to hide. If you have nothing to hide, then you agree to take all the tests, all the time.”
Brian Cushing Blames Overtraining for Positive Test
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Addiction, Drug Testing on August 10th, 2010
A post on the blog Testing It Up reported on the suspension of Houston Texans linebacker Brian Cushing, after testing positive for the banned substance HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin). The athlete was suspended from the first four games of the NFL season, suspended without pay until October 4, and will be ineligible for the Pro Bowl as well as from NFL-sponsored awards.
Cushing, however, denied taking the drug, and maintained that he did not know how it got into his system.
A report on the Associated Press shares that Cushing’s doctors have attributed his failed drug test to a condition called “overtrained athlete syndrome,” which can allegedly trigger hormone spikes.
Bob McNair, owner of the Texans, flew to New York on Monday to meet with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, to see if Cushing’s punishment can be reduced.
Judge Requires Stephanie Seymour’s Ex to Undergo Drug Testing
Posted by DrugFreeHomes in Drug Testing on August 9th, 2010
Stephanie Seymour should not be the only one who should undergo drug testing, as she battles it out in court in divorce and custody proceedings with ex-husband Peter Brant. According to a feature on ContactMusic.com, Judge Michael Shay has denied a request from Brant’s lawyers, who argued that Ms. Seymour should be the only one required to continue undergoing drug testing.
The former supermodel has previously received a slap in the wrist for missing a drug test. At that time, both parties were undergoing drug testing.
Brant’s lawyers, however, said that the publishing mogul should be allowed to skip the testing since he has, so far, maintained a clean record since the court proceedings began last year.
Judge Shay said in his ruling, though, that it would be unfair for Ms. Seymour to have her image before her children stained by the fact that she is the only one submitting samples regularly for the purpose of drug testing. Ms. Seymour’s tests, according the Judge Shay, have all been negative so far.
The former couple is currently battling it out for custody of their three children: Peter Jr., 15; Harry, 12; and Lilly, 4. Brant’s lawyers have previously argued that Seymour was an unfit mother, requesting that full custody be given to Brant.
A trial has been set for next month, September, but the request of Brant’s lawyers for the changing of the drug testing rules prompted a pre-divorce trial hearing in a court at Stamford, Connecticut, last Friday, August 6.


